Legal Opinion

Feist v. Sears, Roebuck & Company

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 1973PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTongue, J.

This is an action for damages for personal injuries sustained by a four-year-old child when a cash register in one of defendant’s stores fell from a counter and struck the head of the child, causing a basal skull fracture. Defendant admitted liability. The jury returned a verdict of $35,000. Defendant appeals, based upon claimed errors in the admission of testimony and in instructions to the jury. We affirm.

The primary issue on appeal, as stated by defendant, is “whether the trial court erred in receiving testimony about the possibility that plaintiff may contract meningitis as a result of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Lorch v. EglinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  2. Schwegel v. GoldbergSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  3. Nielsen v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Fehely v. SendersOregon Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Henderson v. Union Pacific RailroadOregon Supreme Court · 1950

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Ayers v. Township of JacksonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
  2. Blannie S. Wilson, Administratrix of the Estate of Henry J. Wilson, Deceased v. Johns-Manville Sales CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
  3. Dillon v. Evanston HospitalIllinois Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Petriello v. KalmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  5. Davis v. GravissKentucky Supreme Court · 1984

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API