Legal Opinion
Janice S. Hope v. Mirek Klabal
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided August 7, 2006No. 05-1972PublishedCited by 70 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN R. GIBSON, Circuit Judge.
Janice Hope appeals from two orders of the district court 1 granting summary judgment to Mirek Klabal and Lynn Epsteen on her claims arising out of a series of art transactions. She alleges that she purchased artwork from Klabal and Epsteen at fraudulently inflated prices and seeks some $10 million in damages. The district court ruled that all of Hope’s claims were barred by their respective statutes of limitations, except with respect to a single art transaction between Hope and Klabal. Hope argues on appeal that the district court misapplied the discovery rule…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Rotella v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Klehr v. A. O. Smith Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Emerson Thomas v. Marian BashamCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Wallace & Tiernan Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by70 opinions
- Baribeau v. City of MinneapolisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
- Gannon International v. Walter BlockerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
- TCF National Bank v. Market Intelligence, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
- Clark v. BakaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
- McAdams v. McCordCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.