Camino v. Lewis
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Respondent never required jurisdiction either over the defendants nor the subject matter of the action. Our statutes specifically cover the venue or place of trial of actions before justices of the peace. Sec. 5715, Rev. Laws, 1912. There is no allegation in the complaint that defendants reside in Eureka township, nor any allegation as to where defendants reside, nor is there any allegation that the land on which defendants' sheep are alleged to have trespassed is in Eureka township. The complaint totally fails to allege sufficient facts to give the justice's court of Eureka township…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Crossman v. Vivienda Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1902
- Hurd v. FordUtah Supreme Court · 1929
- Schroeder v. WittramCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. ZumwaltSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Jones v. Justice's CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Pellegrini v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2001
- Metz v. MetzNevada Supreme Court · 2004
- Ferguson v. CaminoNevada Supreme Court · 1932
- Ferguson v. CaminoNevada Supreme Court · 1932