St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. Zumwalt
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from Caddo County Court; B. F. Holding, Judge. Action by W. Á. Zumwalt against the St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtKane, J.
It appears from the statement of the case-made by counsel for plaintiff in error (there is no brief on file for the defendant in error) that this was an action commenced by the defendant in error, plaintiff below, against the plaintiff in error, defendant below, to recover damages to a shipment of cattle, caused by the delay of the carrier in failing to deliver said cattle at their destination within a reasonable time. On the day the petition was filed, to wit, March 20, 1909, summons was issued, returnable ten days thereafter, and the defendant was required to answer said petition on or…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Chambless v. LivingstonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Haggerty v. WalkerNebraska Supreme Court · 1887
- City of Guthrie v. T. W. Harvey Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1897
- Lichtenberger v. WormNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
- Willey v. DurginMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
3Cited by17 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. ToddSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
- Kohlenberger, Inc. v. Tyson's Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1974
- Payne v. DewittSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
- Tippins v. TurbenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Hurd v. FordUtah Supreme Court · 1929
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.