Legal Opinion

Pellegrini v. State

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 2001No. 35999PublishedCited by 224 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

In this appeal, we are asked to decide whether NRS 34.726 and its one-year time bar apply to second or successive petitions for post-conviction relief. Appellant David Pellegrini and amicus curiae, the Federal Public Defender, contend that NRS 34.726 applies just to first petitions and that dismissal for delayed filing of second or successive petitions is governed only by the laches provisions of NRS 34.800. We reject this contention and conclude that NRS 34.726 applies to all post-conviction petitions. We also conclude that Pellegrini’s remaining contentions lack merit, and we affirm…

3Cases cited76 opinions

  1. Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Pennsylvania v. FinleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by224 opinions

  1. Antonio Darnell Robinson v. John Ignacio, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  2. Kelly Koerner v. George A. GrigasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  3. Means v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Hathaway v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2003
  5. John Espiredion Valerio v. Jackie Crawford, Director of the Department of Prisons E.K. McDaniel WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002

219 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API