Legal Opinion
Rosenthal v. Wilner
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 28, 1988No. B022120PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*1329Opinion
ARABIAN, J.
Introduction
Jerome B. Rosenthal; Rosenthal & Norton; Rosenthal, Cook & Green; Rosenthal Green & Leon and Rosenthal & Leon (collectively referred to as Rosenthal) appeal from the judgment based on the order of dismissal of the action against Wendy Cole Wilner (aka Wendy Cole Lascher), Edward L. Lascher, Law Offices of Edward L. Lascher, and Lascher & Wilner (a professional corporation) (collectively referred to as the Laschers) for alleged misconduct in their appellate representation of Rosenthal in the case of Day v. Rosenthal.1 The superior court dismissed the complaint…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Day v. RosenthalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Weiner v. Mitchell, Silberberg & KnuppCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Rosenthal v. Irell & ManellaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- Nuckolls v. Bank of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Sacramento County Department of Social Welfare v. Javier L.California Court of Appeal · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Adams v. PaulCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Gaines v. Fidelity National Title Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 2016
- Rare Coin Galleries, Inc. v. A-Mark Coin Co.California Court of Appeal · 1988
- Adams v. PaulCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Gaines v. Fidelity National Title Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 2016