Legal Opinion

Adams v. Paul

California Supreme Court

Decided November 22, 1995No. S041623Published

1Opinion of the Court

11 Cal.4th 583 (1995)

904 P.2d 1205

46 Cal. Rptr.2d 594

KATHERINE ADAMS, Plaintiff and Appellant,

v.

AARON PAUL, Defendant and Respondent.

Docket No. S041623.

Supreme Court of California.

November 22, 1995.

COUNSEL

Barry Balamuth and Kelly Balamuth for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Melamed & Birkley, Howard R. Melamed, Hansen, Boyd, Culhane & Watson, Kevin R. Culhane, Betsy S. Kimball and Joseph Zuber for Defendant and Respondent.

OPINION

ARABIAN, J.

"The most common error of the attorney engaged in litigation is the failure to file the client's claim or cause of action within the time required by a statute of…

2Cases cited56 opinions

  1. Order of Railroad Telegraphers v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Chase Securities Corp. v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Montrose Chemical Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Leal v. Holy Spirit Ass'n for Unification of World ChristianityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Sheldon Appel Co. v. Albert & OlikerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API