Legal Opinion

Rocky Mountain Export Co. v. Colquitt

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 24, 1960No. Civ. 6050PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCoughlin, J.

The plaintiff sold and delivered a portable drilling rig to defendant and in payment received a promissory note secured by a chattel mortgage on the rig.

Eventually plaintiff took possession of the drilling rig; transported it to Denver, Colorado; sold it; applied the proceeds to the payment of the promissory note, after deducting expenses for transportation, upkeep and sale; and brought this action to recover the unpaid balance due under the note.

Plaintiff’s complaint alleged a cause of action for recovery on the promissory note but made no mention of the chattel mortgage. Defendant’s answer…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Vick v. GrasserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  2. Metheny v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  3. Richter v. AdamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  4. Atkins v. AtkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Atlas Thrift Co. v. HoranCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  2. Posz v. BurchellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  3. Godfrey v. SteinpressCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  4. Ragusano v. Civic Center Hospital FoundationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  5. Wickman v. OpperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API