Rocky Mountain Export Co. v. Colquitt
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtCoughlin, J.
The plaintiff sold and delivered a portable drilling rig to defendant and in payment received a promissory note secured by a chattel mortgage on the rig.
Eventually plaintiff took possession of the drilling rig; transported it to Denver, Colorado; sold it; applied the proceeds to the payment of the promissory note, after deducting expenses for transportation, upkeep and sale; and brought this action to recover the unpaid balance due under the note.
Plaintiff’s complaint alleged a cause of action for recovery on the promissory note but made no mention of the chattel mortgage. Defendant’s answer…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Vick v. GrasserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Metheny v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Richter v. AdamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Atkins v. AtkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
3Cited by11 opinions
- Atlas Thrift Co. v. HoranCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Posz v. BurchellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Godfrey v. SteinpressCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- Ragusano v. Civic Center Hospital FoundationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Wickman v. OpperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.