Legal Opinion

Ragusano v. Civic Center Hospital Foundation

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 30, 1962No. Civ. 19413PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBray, P. J.

Combined appeals. Defendant Civic Center Hospital Foundation, a corporation, appeals from an order granting plaintiff a new trial against it. Plaintiff, as a precautionary measure under rule 3(a), Rules on Appeal, cross-appeals from the judgment of nonsuit granted defendant hospital. Plaintiff appeals from the judgment after jury verdict against her in favor of defendant doctors.

Questions Presented

Defendant Hospital’s Appeal From Order Granting New Trial

1. Did the pretrial conference order eliminate any cause of action against defendant hospital?

2. Was res ipsa loquitur applicable as against…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Ybarra v. SpangardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Summers v. TiceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Seneris v. HaasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Zentz v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.California Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Salgo v. Leland Stanford Jr. University Board of TrusteesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Clark v. GibbonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Posz v. BurchellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  3. Pearson v. NortonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  4. Reilly Ex Rel. Reilly v. StraubSupreme Court of Iowa · 1979
  5. Gin Non Louie v. Chinese Hospital Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1967

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API