Sanders v. Universal Life & Accident Ins. Co.
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
WALTHALL, Justice.
The prosecution of this appeal grows out of the action' of the trial court in sustaining a general demurrer to appellee’s petition and dismissing her suit.
We will designate the parties, respectively, as appellant andi appellee.
Appellant’s second amended original petition, upon which the case went to trial, is lengthy, and without copying it here at length, we will state it sufficiently to make clear the point or points to be decided on this appeal.
■Appellant’s petition states her cause of action in paragraphs numbered from 1 to 10, but in stating the facts pleaded we will…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Pierce v. Tennessee Coal, Iron & RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Pollack v. PollackTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931
- Pollack v. PollackTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
- American Nat. Ins. Co. v. HueyTexas Commission of Appeals · 1933
- Camerom Mill and Elevator Co. v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1903
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Universal Life & Accident Insurance v. SandersTexas Supreme Court · 1937
- American Nat. Ins. Co. v. PointsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
- Needham v. American Nat. Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1936
- Southland Life Ins. Co. v. GatewoodCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
- CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY v. VaughnCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.