Legal Opinion

Kosich v. Braz

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 17, 1967No. Civ. 22932PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN (H. C.), J.

Respondents filed an action for an injunction to restain appellants from interfering with their use of an easement. Appellants claim that this easement was limited to a 12-foot roadway and that respondents were exceeding that limitation at one point of the road and encroaching on their land. The trial court held that the respondents were entitled to an enlargement of the easement in conforming to the original intent of the parties and gave judgment accordingly.

There is no substantial dispute relative to the facts. Respondents and appellants are adjoining landowners.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Danielson v. SykesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Wallace Ranch Water Co. v. Foothill Ditch Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Youngstown Steel Products Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Pollard v. RebmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Vargas v. MaderosCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Golden West Baseball Co. v. City of AnaheimCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  2. Red Mountain, LLC v. Fallbrook Public Utility DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API