Pollard v. Rebman
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County and from an order refusing a new trial. W. P. James, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
When the owner of a parcel of land buys an easement over adjoining land for a way from his land to a public street, such easement becomes at once appurtenant to his land, giving him access to the street over such way.
If he fails to have the conveyance for such easement legally . recorded, it remains good, nevertheless, against the grantor of the easement. But if the grantor of the easement, in such case, for a valuable consideration, afterwards unconditionally conveys the servient tenement to another, who takes without notice of the grant of the right of way, or of the use of the way, and…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Bell v. PleasantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
3Cited by17 opinions
- Vertson v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Wallace v. WhitmoreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Jones v. HarmonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Harry E. McHugh, Inc. v. HaleyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
- Smith v. SkrbekCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.