Legal Opinion

Haavisto v. Perpich

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided June 9, 1993No. C0-92-1719, C7-92-1720PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SHORT, Judge.

This case arises out of the tuberculosis epidemic at the Minnesota Correctional Facility at Stillwater (prison) in the mid-1980s. Antti Haavisto alleges the diagnosis of his active tuberculosis was unnecessarily delayed by the prison health care system and in particular, by the conduct of Dr. James Allan (physician). A federal counterpart case was litigated as a class action for injunctive relief. See generally DeGidio v. Pung, 704 F.Supp. 922, 957 (D.Minn.1989) (prison officials’ inadequate response to tuberculosis epidemic violated inmates’ Eighth Amendment rights),…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Malley v. BriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Eastern Idaho Agricultural Credit Ass'n v. NeibaurIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Haavisto v. PerpichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
  3. Haavisto v. PerpichCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
  4. Haavisto v. PerpichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API