Legal Opinion

Haavisto v. Perpich

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 19, 1994No. C0-92-1719, C7-92-1720Published

1Opinion of the Court

520 N.W.2d 727 (1994)

Antti John HAAVISTO, Appellant,

v.

Rudy PERPICH, individually and as Governor of the State of Minnesota; et al., Defendants,

Orville B. Pung, individually and as Corrections Commissioner of the State of Minnesota; et al., Respondents,

Dr. James Allan, individually and as Medical Director of the Minnesota State Prison at Stillwater, Appellant.

Nos. C0-92-1719, C7-92-1720.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

August 19, 1994.

Rehearing Denied October 13, 1994.

John C. McNulty, Marcy S. Wallace, Charlotte M. Reed, McNulty & Wallace, St. Paul, for Haavisto.

Timothy R. Murphy, Geraghty,…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API