Legal Opinion
Haavisto v. Perpich
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided June 9, 1993No. C0-92-1719, C7-92-1720Published
1Opinion of the Court
498 N.W.2d 746 (1993)
Antti John HAAVISTO, Respondent,
v.
Rudy PERPICH, individually and as Governor of the State of Minnesota, et al., Defendants,
Orville B. Pung, individually, and as Corrections Commissioner of the State of Minnesota, et al., Appellants (C0-92-1719),
Dr. James Allan, individually and as Medical Director of the Minnesota State Prison at Stillwater, Appellant (C7-92-1720).
Nos. C0-92-1719, C7-92-1720.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota.
April 13, 1993.
Review Granted June 9, 1993.
Marcy S. Wallace, John C. McNulty, Charlotte M. Reed, McNulty & Wallace, St. Paul, for respondent.
Hubert H.…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Malley v. BriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.