Legal Opinion
Haavisto v. Perpich
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided August 19, 1994No. C0-92-1719, C7-92-1720PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WAHL, Justice.
Antti John Haavisto, in appeal CO-92-1719, asks us to decide whether the defense of qualified immunity applies, as a matter of law, to bar his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim of constitutionally inadequate medical care while he was an inmate at Minnesota Correctional Facility at Stillwater (Stillwater) against Commissioner of Corrections Orville Pung and Stillwater Warden Robert Erickson. Specifically, Haavisto claims that a delayed diagnosis of tuberculosis deprived him of his constitutional rights under the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution. We reach the…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Popp Telcom, Formerly Known as Ldb International Corporation, Inc., Humbird Securities, Company Northern Securities, Company, Washington Sharecom, Inc. v. American Sharecom, Inc. Steven C. Simon James J. Weinert William J. King, Popp Telcom, Formerly Known as Ldb International Corporation, Inc., Humbird Securities, Company Northern Securities, Company, Washington Sharecom, Inc. v. American Sharecom, Inc. Steven C. Simon James J. Weinert William J. KingCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
- Eastern Idaho Agricultural Credit Ass'n v. NeibaurIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
- KYMN, Inc. v. Langeslag (In Re Langeslag)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 2007
- Heine v. SimonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- Williamson v. GuentzelCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.