Hope v. Arrowhead & Puritas Waters, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtLillie, J.
Plaintiff claims personal injuries as a result of having been struck from the' rear by one of defendant’s fork lift trucks while standing in the loading yard of the Arrowhead and Puritas Waters, Ine. Pacific Indemnity Company, carrier under a contract of Workmen’s Compensation insurance, filed a complaint in intervention. A jury trial resulted in a verdict in favor of defendant. Plaintiff Hope appeals from the judgment and order denying him a new trial.
Bound by the rule that a reviewing court must look to the evidence favorable to the finding or verdict, and to inferences reasonably dedueible…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Gray v. BrinkerhoffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Christiansen v. HollingsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Shields v. Oxnard Harbor DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Lewis v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Healy v. Visalia & Tulare R.R.California Supreme Court · 1894
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Grimshaw v. Ford Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 1981
- Mann v. CracchioloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Chrysler Corp. v. TodorovichWyoming Supreme Court · 1978
- Brown v. ColmCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- People v. LewisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.