Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Shea

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 28, 1916No. Civ. No. 1711PublishedCited by 13 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order denying a new trial. Charles Wellborn, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. O’Melveny, Stevens &. Millikin, Walter K. Tuller, and Alex Macdonald, for Appellants.

1Opinion of the CourtJames, J.

Appeal taken by defendants C. E. Cooper and Robert Marsh from a judgment entered against them, and from an order denying their motion for a new trial.

At a time anterior to the commencement of this action defendant R. P. Shea held contract rights in certain real property located in the city of Los Angeles. He exchanged these rights with one Vance for an automobile. At a later date Vance desired to dispose of the interest thus acquired in the real estate. Shea and Cooper at that time were both employed with Robert Marsh & Co., realty brokers. Under their contract of employment commissions…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Robson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Chung Kee v. DavidsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Ulwelling v. Crown Coach Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1962
  2. Van Derhoof v. ChambonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  3. Kolberg v. Sherwin-Williams Co.California Court of Appeal · 1928
  4. Perrine v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1960
  5. Horstmann Co. v. WatermanWashington Supreme Court · 1918

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API