Legal Opinion

Rowlett v. Fagan

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 14, 2014No. 090101006; A146351PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNakamoto, J.

Plaintiffs Rowlett and his two companies, plaintiffs Westlake Development Company, Inc. and Westlake Development Group, LLC, appeal in this attorney malpractice action against their former attorneys, defendants Schwabe Williamson & Wyatt, PC (Schwabe) and lawyers Fagan and Finn. Some, but not all, of plaintiffs’ theories of defendants’ negligence went to trial, as did plaintiffs’ claims for negligent misrepresentation and breach of fiduciary duty. There was a defense verdict on the latter two claims, which plaintiffs do not challenge on appeal. As for the negligence claim, plaintiffs achieved…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Stevens v. BisphamOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Baker v. Commercial Body Builders, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Waddill v. Anchor Hocking, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Shoup v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Northwest Natural Gas Co. v. Chase Gardens, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1999

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. SmithNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Rowlett v. FaganOregon Supreme Court · 2016
  3. State v. ClinkenbeardMontana Supreme Court · 2025
  4. Teegarden v. State ex rel. Oregon Youth AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  5. Reynosa-Juarez v. Accountable Healthcare Staffing, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2019

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API