Legal Opinion
Hayes v. Pierce
California Supreme Court
Decided July 17, 1940No. L. A. 16470; L. A. 16609PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
These are companion eases which were consolidated for hearing before this court.
L. A. No. 16470: In this cause plaintiff has appealed from an order denying his motion to vacate two orders, one an order setting aside a default judgment and the other an order setting the cause for trial.
An action for rescission of a contract to purchase real property and for other relief, was filed by plaintiff in 1935 against Walter 0. Ferguson and Kathryn M. Ferguson, his wife. On January 7, 1936, a default judgment in the sum of $813.05 and costs was entered in plaintiff’s favor. The facts which…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hayes v. PierceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Klement v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
3Cited by3 opinions
- Mortgage Guarantee Co. v. LeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Olson v. HopkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Engineers, Ltd. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942