Legal Opinion

Crick v. Rash

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided March 11, 1921PublishedCited by 52 opinions

Appeal from Hopkins Circuit court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Thomas

Affirming in part and reversing in part.

The appellant Crick (one of the defendants below) is the county judge of Hopkins county, and he and the other appellants', who were also defendants below, as members of the fiscal court of the county, with other officers and persons deemed necessary parties, were sued below in this action by the appellee and plaintiff below, James R. Rash, a citizen and taxpayer of the county, to obtain an injunction restraining defendants from issuing, selling or disposing of any part of a $500,000.00 road bond issue which had been…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Lake County v. RollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Uhler v. City of OlympiaWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  3. State ex rel. University of Utah v. CandlandUtah Supreme Court · 1909
  4. State v. West Duluth Land Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
  5. Mills v. LantripCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Boswell v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  2. State Ex Rel. Capitol Addition Bldg. Commission v. ConnellyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1935
  3. State Ex Rel. Diederichs v. State Highway CommissionMontana Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Klein v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  5. Witzenburger v. State ex rel. Wyoming Community Development AuthorityWyoming Supreme Court · 1978

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API