Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Ross v. King County

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 30, 1937No. 26529. En BancPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteinert, C. J.

— Two actions in mandamus, herein consolidated, were instituted by a number of employees of King county to compel the issuance of warrants for the unpaid portions of their salaries alleged by them to have been earned during a period of two successive years. Trial upon the merits before the court, sitting without a jury, resulted in findings and conclusions, based upon which judgments were entered conformable to the prayers of the petitions. The county has appealed.

During the years 1933 and 1934, respondents, thirty-five in number, were members of the staff of the county clerk of King county.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Knez v. SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Rudnick v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1936
  3. State Ex Rel. Heffernan v. HoquiamWashington Supreme Court · 1936

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Puget Construction Co. v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1964
  2. State Ex Rel. Bradford v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Watkins v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Kerr v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  5. State Ex Rel. Thompson v. Gallatin CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1947

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API