State Ex Rel. Ross v. King County
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSteinert, C. J.
— Two actions in mandamus, herein consolidated, were instituted by a number of employees of King county to compel the issuance of warrants for the unpaid portions of their salaries alleged by them to have been earned during a period of two successive years. Trial upon the merits before the court, sitting without a jury, resulted in findings and conclusions, based upon which judgments were entered conformable to the prayers of the petitions. The county has appealed.
During the years 1933 and 1934, respondents, thirty-five in number, were members of the staff of the county clerk of King county.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Knez v. SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1934
- Rudnick v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1936
- State Ex Rel. Heffernan v. HoquiamWashington Supreme Court · 1936
3Cited by9 opinions
- Puget Construction Co. v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1964
- State Ex Rel. Bradford v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1938
- Watkins v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1940
- Kerr v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1953
- State Ex Rel. Thompson v. Gallatin CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1947
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.