Legal Opinion
Rudnick v. Pierce County
Washington Supreme Court
Decided February 4, 1936No. 26044. Department TwoPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBeals, J.
The county commissioners of Pierce county, at a meeting held June 7, 1932, unanimously adopted a resolution fixing a wage scale to apply to certain of the county employees. The preamble to the resolution reads as follows:
“Be It Resolved by the Board of County Commissioners that the following schedule of wages, not to exceed the amounts listed, shall apply to all Pierce County pay rolls submitted on Road and Bridge work, Road District work, River Improvement work, and all other work performed under the jurisdiction of Pierce county, retroactive to June 1st, 1932, viz: . .
This resolution…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Scheller v. Tacoma Railway & Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1919
- State ex rel. McMillan v. MillerWashington Supreme Court · 1919
- Pacific Coal & Lumber Co. v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1925
- Marshall v. Whatcom CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1927
- State Ex Rel. Taylor v. ScofieldWashington Supreme Court · 1935
3Cited by9 opinions
- Puget Construction Co. v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1964
- Chatfield v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1939
- State Ex Rel. Bradford v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1938
- State Ex Rel. Ross v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1937
- State Ex Rel. Thompson v. Gallatin CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1947
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.