Legal Opinion

Matter of Zemple

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided September 29, 1992No. C7-92-1099PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HUSPENI, Judge.

Appellant challenges his commitment as mentally ill on the grounds that the trial court erred in taking judicial notice of a prior proceeding and that the court’s finding of dangerousness is not supported by sufficient evidence. We affirm.

PACTS

In March of 1992, appellant Loren Lyle Zemple’s father filed a domestic abuse action under Minn.Stat. ch. 518B (1990) in district court. At the hearing on the petition, appellant’s father testified that appellant slapped him in the face. Appellant was not represented by counsel at this action and did not cross-examine his father.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Matter of Welfare of ClausenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  2. Matter of Conservatorship of TorresSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  3. Kass v. KassCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  4. Matter of MayCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
  5. Matter of MinerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Jakab v. JakabSupreme Court of Vermont · 1995
  2. In Re the Welfare of D.J.N.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
  3. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation v. Gary E. Mitchell, John DoeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
  4. Rohricht v. O'HARECourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
  5. Christopher R. Coker, (A15-1439, A15-1445), (A15-1606) v. Emily Johnson Piper, Commissioner of Human Services, (A15-1439), (A15-1606), Hennepin County, (A15-1445).Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API