Legal Opinion

Matter of May

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 3, 1991No. C4-91-1535PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SHORT, Judge.

On appeal from a judgment of commitment as a chemically dependent person, Melvin C. May argues (1) the trial court lost jurisdiction due to a delay of more than forty-four days from filing of the petition until the hearing date, and (2) there is insufficient evidence to support his commitment as a chemically dependent person. We disagree and affirm.

FACTS

On May 1, appellant’s sister petitioned for judicial commitment of appellant as a chemically dependent person. On several occasions, sheriffs deputies attempted to serve appellant with a summons. The trial court promptly…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. PedersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  2. In Re the Alleged Chemically Dependent GalushaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  3. Matter of MelasCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  4. Matter of StubbeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
  5. In Re HeurungCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re the Civil Commitment of GiemSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
  2. In the Interest of T.H.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Matter of BuckhaltonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
  4. Matter of ZempleCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
  5. In Re the Civil Commitment of GiemCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API