Matter of May
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SHORT, Judge.
On appeal from a judgment of commitment as a chemically dependent person, Melvin C. May argues (1) the trial court lost jurisdiction due to a delay of more than forty-four days from filing of the petition until the hearing date, and (2) there is insufficient evidence to support his commitment as a chemically dependent person. We disagree and affirm.
FACTS
On May 1, appellant’s sister petitioned for judicial commitment of appellant as a chemically dependent person. On several occasions, sheriffs deputies attempted to serve appellant with a summons. The trial court promptly…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. PedersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- In Re the Alleged Chemically Dependent GalushaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Matter of MelasCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Matter of StubbeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
- In Re HeurungCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re the Civil Commitment of GiemSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- In the Interest of T.H.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Matter of BuckhaltonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
- Matter of ZempleCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
- In Re the Civil Commitment of GiemCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007