Legal Opinion

In Re the Welfare of D.J.N.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 12, 1997No. C2-96-2380PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CRIPPEN, Judge.

Appellants dispute trial court orders that terminate their parental rights with respect to six children. Appellants claim that the trial court erred in reopening the evidence and taking judicial notice of the juvenile court file, which includes transcripts and exhibits from a 1994 child protection proceeding. Appellants further assert that the trial court erred in conditionally admitting child protection and adoption services files, as well as erring in several other evidential rulings. Finally, appellants allege bias by the trial court, the rendering of findings that…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Uselman v. UselmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  2. In Re the Welfare of M.D.O.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  3. Matter of Welfare of ClausenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  4. Stanford v. StanfordSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
  5. Thompson v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In re S.B.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2002
  2. Matter of Welfare of JMSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  3. In re S.A.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Rohricht v. O'HARECourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
  5. In Re SASouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API