Legal Opinion
Rohricht v. O'HARE
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided December 8, 1998No. C1-98-1340PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HARTEN, Judge.
Appellant brought a legal malpractice action against respondents, the attorneys and law firms who represented him in the trial and appeal of his dissolution action, alleging that their negligence and breach of contract were responsible for an adverse trial court decision on child custody and our subsequent appellate decision to affirm the custody award. Respondents moved to dismiss under Minn. R. Civ. P. 12.02(e), alleging appellant’s failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. The district court granted the motion, and appellant challenges the dismissal.
FAC…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Marriage of Rutten v. RuttenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Elzie v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Blue Water Corp., Inc. v. O'TOOLESupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Rouse v. Dunkley & Bennett, P.A.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Greer v. Professional Fiduciary, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011