Ingersoll v. Onondaga Hockey Club, Inc.

In his opinion Mr. Justice Rhodes has made a correct, accurate and concise statement of the facts in this case and repetition is unnecessary

*138It seems to me that the evidence presents no question of fact and that the learned trial judge was correct in dismissing the complaint. The authorities are all agreed that the owner or proprietor of a public place of amusement or entertainment is not the insurer of the safety of his patrons but owes to them only the duty of reasonable care. Our conclusion is that the duty which respondents owed to appellant is to be measured by the standards of ordinary…