Legal Opinion
Eadie v. Krause
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Decided December 22, 2008No. 4472PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PIEPER, J.:
In this legal malpractice action, Christopher A. Eadie (Ea-die) appeals from a trial court order granting summary judgment in favor of Steven M. Krause and the law firm of Krause and Moorhead, P.A. (Krause). We affirm.
FACTS
The instant case arises from a workers’ compensation claim in which Krause was retained to represent Eadie in an action seeking workers’ compensation benefits for injuries he sustained while completing a job for Complete Company, Inc. (Complete).
Complete is a small commercial industrial maintenance business incorporated in Tennessee and, wholly owned by Ronald…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Futch v. McAllister Towing of Georgetown, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
- Baughman v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
- Law v. South Carolina Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
- Town of Summerville v. City of North CharlestonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
- Stone v. BetheaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1968
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Paul Sartin v. McNair Law Firm PACourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014
- Kase v. EbertCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2011
- McKnight v. South Carolina Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2009
- Haney v. White & Case LLPDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2021