Legal Opinion

Snavely v. AMISUB of South Carolina, Inc.

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided June 12, 2008No. 4413PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

In this action for breach of patient-physician confidentiality, Lisa Snavely appeals the trial court’s grant of Piedmont Medical Center’s (Piedmont) motion for summary judgment. We affirm. 1

FACTS

On January 20, 2003, Carol Brooks, Snavely’s sister-in-law, drove Snavely to the emergency room of Piedmont because Snavely was complaining of weakness, jaundice, and abdominal pain. 2 Per Snavely’s request, Mrs. Brooks accompanied her to a private examination room. Dr. Zellner, an emergency room physician working at Piedmont, examined Snavely in Mrs. Brooks’ presence and questioned Snavely regarding…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Futch v. McAllister Towing of Georgetown, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  2. Law v. South Carolina Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
  3. Swinton Creek Nursery v. Edisto Farm CreditSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  4. David v. McLeod Regional Medical CenterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
  5. Simmons v. Tuomey Regional Medical CenterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Carolina Renewal, Inc. v. South Carolina Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2009
  2. State v. HewinsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2014
  3. Fairchild v. South Carolina Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2009
  4. Kunst v. LoreeCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2013
  5. Carolina Renewal, Inc. v. South Carolina Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API