United States v. Clarke
U.S. Army Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
De GIULIO, Senior Judge:
Appellant was tried by a general court-martial consisting of officer and enlisted members. Contrary to his pleas, he was found guilty of two specifications of indecent acts,1 assault with intent to commit sodomy and nonconsensual sodomy in violation of Articles 124 and 125, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. §§ 924, 925, respectively. He was sentenced to a dishonorable discharge, confinement for twenty-five years, total forfeitures and reduction to Private E-l. The convening authority reduced the confinement to twenty years, but…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. SalesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
- Joel Reyes v. Missouri Pacific Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- United States v. CattUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
- United States v. BrenizerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1985
- United States v. StockenU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1984
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. HullettUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1994
- United States v. ClarkeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
- United States v. BlakeU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1991
- United States v. WalesU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1989
- United States v. ColemanCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.