Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Hullett

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided September 15, 1994No. 93-0792; CMR No. 9101803PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GIERKE, Judge.

A special court-martial composed of officer and enlisted members convicted appellant, contrary to his pleas, of committing an indecent act; communicating indecent language (2 specifications); and obstructing justice, in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 934. The approved sentence provides for a bad-eonduet discharge and reduction to the lowest enlisted grade. The Court of Military Review set aside the conviction of obstructing justice, affirmed the remaining findings of guilty, and reassessed and affirmed the sentence. 36 MJ 938 (1993).…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. United States v. SnyderUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1952
  3. United States v. FrenchUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
  4. United States v. FrazierUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992
  5. United States v. AsfeldU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1990

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. United States v. MaxwellCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996
  2. United States v. GreenCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2010
  3. United States v. BrinsonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1998
  4. United States v. MaxwellUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1995
  5. United States v. CaverNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 1994

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API