Legal Opinion

United States v. Stocken

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided January 30, 1984No. SPCM 17620PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

YAWN, Judge:

Appellant, a noncommissioned officer, was convicted of seven offenses involving marijuana and two specifications of fraternization, violations of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 934. His approved sentence provides for reduction to Private E — 1, forfeiture of $150.00 pay per month for six months, confinement at hard labor for forty-five days, and a bad-conduct discharge. Before this Court he contends the facts alleged in the fraternization specifications1 fail to allege that or any other offense. We agree.

*828United States v. Horton, 14…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Parker v. LevySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Orloff v. WilloughbySupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  3. Bell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. United States v. BerryUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1956
  5. United States v. SadinskyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1964

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. United States v. JohannsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1985
  2. United States v. McCreightCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996
  3. United States v. ClarkeU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1987
  4. United States v. Van SteenwykU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1985
  5. United States v. CallawayU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1986

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API