United States v. Stocken
U.S. Army Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
YAWN, Judge:
Appellant, a noncommissioned officer, was convicted of seven offenses involving marijuana and two specifications of fraternization, violations of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 934. His approved sentence provides for reduction to Private E — 1, forfeiture of $150.00 pay per month for six months, confinement at hard labor for forty-five days, and a bad-conduct discharge. Before this Court he contends the facts alleged in the fraternization specifications1 fail to allege that or any other offense. We agree.
*828United States v. Horton, 14…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Parker v. LevySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Orloff v. WilloughbySupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Bell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United States v. BerryUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1956
- United States v. SadinskyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1964
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- United States v. JohannsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1985
- United States v. McCreightCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996
- United States v. ClarkeU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1987
- United States v. Van SteenwykU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1985
- United States v. CallawayU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.