Legal Opinion

Londoff v. Vuylsteke

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 27, 1999No. 74782PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, Judge.

In this case plaintiff, who formerly was an attorney, sought to recover, under an oral fee splitting agreement, 50% of an attorney’s fee from defendants after one of the defendants, an attorney, settled a lawsuit for $120,500.00. The trial court entered summary judgment in the settling attorney’s favor on the grounds that the fee splitting agreement was unenforceable under the Rules of Professional Conduct because plaintiff did not allege or raise a fact issue that he performed services proportionate to the fee or assumed joint responsibility for the lawsuit in a…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  2. Mahoney v. Doerhoff Surgical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  3. Colleen Baer v. First Options of Chicago, Incorporated, Appeal of Davis, Miner, Barnhill & Galland, P.C. v. James R. AntonionoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
  4. Post v. BregmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  5. Holstein v. GrossmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Walker v. GribbleSupreme Court of Iowa · 2004
  2. Law Offices of Gary Green, P.C. v. MorrisseyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. ENG v. CUMMINGS, McCLOREY, DAVIS & ACHO, PLCCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
  4. Daynard v. Ness, Motley, Loadholt, Richardson & Poole, P.A.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2001
  5. Norton Frickey, PC v. JAMES B. TURNER, PCColorado Court of Appeals · 2004

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API