Legal Opinion

ENG v. CUMMINGS, McCLOREY, DAVIS & ACHO, PLC

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided July 9, 2010No. 09-2426PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHEPHERD, Circuit Judge.

Patrick Eng, individually and on behalf of his partners in the Missouri law firm of Eng & Woods (collectively “Eng & Woods”), filed a declaratory judgment action against Cummings, McClorey, Davis & Acho, PLC (“CMDA”), a Michigan law firm, seeking a judgment that Eng & Woods need not share a portion of the attorney’s fees awarded to the firm in a personal injury action. CMDA cross-claimed to recover one-third of the fee award. The district court2 granted sum*430mary judgment in favor of Eng & Woods. We affirm.

I

We recite the facts in the light most favorable to CMDA. See…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Goldfarb v. Virginia State BarSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Bettye S. Gentry and Katherine D. Whitley v. Georgia-Pacific CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
  4. Viking Supply, a Subsidiary of Gerald F. Ogren, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation v. National Cart Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
  5. Dovenmuehler v. St. Cloud HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Employers Reinsurance Co. v. Massachusetts Mutual Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
  2. Doe v. NebraskaDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2010
  3. Butts v. Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan SocietyDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2012
  4. Jacobs v. Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan SocietyDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2012
  5. Clark v. General Motors, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 2015

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API