Legal Opinion

Holstein v. Grossman

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided July 6, 1993No. 1-90-3470PublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Opinion of the Court · BuckleyJustice Buckley

In July 1981, plaintiff-attorney Thomas Holstein allegedly entered an oral fee-referral agreement with defendants attorney Richard Grossman (Grossman) and his law firm, now named Steinberg, Burtker & Grossman, Ltd. (SB&G). Under the claimed agreement, plaintiff was to refer personal injury cases to SB&G in exchange for a one-half share of any attorney fees which defendants might receive. Plaintiff claims to have subsequently referred 10 cases to defendants and to have received a 50% referral fee on five of the cases.

Plaintiff alleges that defendants secretly settled referred cases refusing…

Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Buckley.

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Kravis v. Smith Marine, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1975
  2. O'HARA v. AhlgrenIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Zeigler v. Illinois Trust & Savings BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Corti v. FleisherAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  5. McClure Engineering Associates, Inc. v. Reuben H. Donnelley Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1983

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. People v. SimmsIllinois Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Colleen Baer v. First Options of Chicago, Incorporated, Appeal of Davis, Miner, Barnhill & Galland, P.C. v. James R. AntonionoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
  3. Blondell v. LittlepageCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  4. Braye v. Archer-Daniels-Midland Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Post v. BregmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API