Legal Opinion

Bibbins v. W. W. Clark & Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 2, 1894PublishedCited by 50 opinions

Appeal from Polk District Court.-. — Hon. C. P. Holmes, Judge. Action in equity. Judgment and decree for defendants. Plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtKinne, J.

I. The facts in this case are that during the years 1886, 1887 and 1888 defendants W. W. Clark, Lavina W. Clark and A. W. Ford were copart-ners doing business in the city of Des Moines under the firm name of W. W. Clark & Company; that one half of the taxes upon the personal property of W. W. Clark *232& Company for 1887 were not paid by them, and the entire taxes upon their personal property for 3 888 were not paid by them; that November 1, 1888, M. W. Bibbins sold and conveyed to W. W. Clark certain lots in Lee township, city of Des Moines, subject to a mortgage of ten thousand dollars and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Homestead Company v. Valley RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  2. Dickey v. County of PolkSupreme Court of Iowa · 1882
  3. Miller v. AndersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Jaffray & Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1885
  5. Garrigan v. KnightSupreme Court of Iowa · 1877

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. California Loan & Trust Co. v. WeisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. De Laney v. City and County of Denver Etal. In Re WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1950
  3. Carstens & Earles, Inc. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  4. State v. Central Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1899
  5. Des Moines Brick Manufacturing Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API