Legal Opinion

Hollenbeck v. City of Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 19, 1925No. 19331. En BancPublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTolman, C. J.

— Appellant, as plaintiff, brought this action to enjoin what was alleged to be an unauthorized and unlawful disposition of .certain funds by the respondent city and its officers. A demurrer was sustained to the amended complaint, plaintiff elected to stand on his complaint, his action was dismissed, and this appeal followed.

The complaint, by proper averments, shows that appellant is the holder of local improvement bond No. 84, for the sum of two hundred dollars issued by the city of Seattle against local improvement district No. 3446, which bond is payable solely from the proceeds of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Case v. HowellWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Malette v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Carstens & Earles, Inc. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Woodill & Hulse Electric Co. v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  5. City of Seattle v. HillWashington Supreme Court · 1896

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Homann v. HuberWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Seattle Mortgage Co. v. Unknown Heirs of Daisy GrayCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  3. Summerhill Village Homeowners Ass'n v. RoughleyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  4. Bank of America, NA v. OwensWashington Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Bank of America, NA v. OwensWashington Supreme Court · 2011

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API