Legal Opinion

White v. . McCabe

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 26, 1935PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stacy, C. J.,

after stating the case: It may be conceded that the question of liability insurance was brought to the attention of the jury in excess of any manner heretofore approved by our decisions. Fulcher v. Lumber Co., 191 N. C., 408, 132 S. E., 9. The limitation upon such references is clearly marked in this jurisdiction. Bryant v. Furniture Co., 186 N. C., 441, 119 S. E., 823. Nevertheless, in the instant case, it is conceded that the evidence offered by the plaintiff, on the issue of damages, is sufficient to justify the award, and that the amount is not excessive. In the face of this…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. . BealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  2. State v. . CopeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  3. Linville v. . NissenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  4. Wise v. . HollowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  5. Fulcher v. Pine Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1926

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Smith v. SimpsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  2. Scott v. . BryanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  3. Spivey v. NewmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  4. Woods v. . Roadway Express, and SwannSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  5. Barrett v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API