Barrett v. . Williams
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.
In directing an answer to the 5th issue, the court held as a matter of law that the defendants were estopped by the record herein from asserting any claim for betterments. The ruling seems to have been an inadvertence, Pritchard v. Williams, 176 N. C., 108, 96 S. E., 733, on rehearing 178 N. C., 444, 101 S. E., 85; S. c., 181 N. C., 46, 106 S. E., 144; Faison v. Kelly, 149 N. C., 282, 62 S. E., 1086, though not necessarily fatal. Foxman v. Hanes, 218 N. C., 722, 12 S. E. (2d), 258; Rankin v. Oates, 183 N. C., 517, 112 S. E., 32. “A new trial will not be granted when the action of the trial…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Rankin v. OatesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
- Brewer v. RingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
- Rankin v. . OatesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
- Butts v. . ScrewsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
- Brewer v. . Ring and ValkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Wright v. WrightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- Rogers v. . TimberlakeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- Harrison v. . DardenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- Featherstone v. . GlennSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945