Legal Opinion

Bonner v. Los Angeles Examiner

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 13, 1936No. Civ. 10995PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrail, P. J.

This is an appeal from an order granting defendant’s motion for a new trial in an action for damages for libel. The jury awarded $30,000 as compensatory damages and $45,000 as exemplary damages. The order for new trial was granted upon the following grounds: “ (1) Excessive damages, appearing to have been given under the influence of passion or prejudice; (2) Insufficiency of the evidence to justify the verdict; (3J That the verdict is against the law; (4) Error in law, occurring at the trial and excepted to by the defendant.” Where such a motion is granted for insufficiency of evidence to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Davis v. HearstCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Bond v. United R.R. of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Harrison v. Sutter Street RailwayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Stevens v. SnowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Rosenberg v. Geo. A. Moore & Co.California Supreme Court · 1924

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Mazzotta v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.California Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Leaper v. GandyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  3. Kent v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1938
  4. Murphy v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  5. Shortt v. Los Angeles Gas & Electric Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1939

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API