Legal Opinion

Murphy v. Davis

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 23, 1937No. Civ. 11170PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrail, P. J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff in an action for damages for breach of contract to marry.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the successful party in the trial court, the facts are as follows: Defendant asked plaintiff to marry him, and shortly thereafter plaintiff accepted said promise to marry defendant and gave her promise in return. In the fall of 1934 defendant renewed said promise to marry but postponed the marriage from time to time without fixing a definite date. Plaintiff, in view of the fact that she was engaged to marry defendant, was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Reed v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Liebrandt v. SorgCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Bonner v. Los Angeles ExaminerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  4. Boigneres v. BoulonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Harned v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Cheema v. L.S. Trucking, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2019
  3. Cheema v. L.S. Trucking, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2019
  4. Murphy v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API