Legal Opinion

Kent v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 29, 1938No. Civ. 11966PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrail, P. J.

This is an appeal from an order granting a motion for a new trial. The jury bad returned a verdict in the sum of $25,436, upon which judgment had been entered. The court granted the motion upon the ground, among others, of “excessive damages given under the influence of passion”.

The plaintiff, a blind girl seventeen years of age, was a passenger of the defendant and stepped down from the rear end of the car and into an open switch box, three and three-quarter inches wide and more than five inches in depth. The plaintiff was injured, the bones of one of her legs being broken. The jury found…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bond v. United R.R. of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Kimic v. San Jose-Los Gatos Interurban Ry.California Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Siemsen v. Oakland, San Leandro, & Haywards Electric RailwayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1917
  5. Wiezorek v. FerrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Maffeo v. HolmesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  2. DELL'OCA v. Bank of New York & Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 2008
  3. People v. ChapmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  4. Mallot v. Blue Diamond Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API