State v. Kircher
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtVergeront, J.
Michael Kircher appeals a conviction of homicide by intoxicated use of a vehicle. He contends: (1) the statute under which he was prosecuted, § 940.09, STATS., is unconstitutional because it requires him to prove his innocence by establishing an affirmative defense; (2) the prosecution's destruction of a tape recording of a 911 telephone call he placed after the accident prohibited him from establishing the affirmative defense; (3) he was denied his constitu- , tional right to a unanimous jury verdict when the trial court failed to instruct the jury that it must unani mously agree before…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- California v. TrombettaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. DyessWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. Kwan Fai MakWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. SturdivantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. PareSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- State v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1996
- State v. PlantinCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
- State v. SeeleyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1997
- State v. C. Spielvogel & Sons Excavating, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.