Higgins v. Standard Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtShepard, J.
Plaintiff-appellant Higgins brought two actions against defendant-respondent Desert Braemar, Inc., a corporation (hereinafter called “Desert”); one was to recover the reasonable value of plaintiff’s services as general contractor in the construction of apartment buildings near Palm Springs; the other was to foreclose a claim of general contractor’s lien on the same property against the same defendant for the same services. Other defendants were originally named, but all defendants except Desert were dismissed prior to trial. The two actions were consolidated for trial. From a judgment of…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Lewis & Queen v. N. M. Ball SonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Norwood v. JuddCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Holm v. BramwellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Sunset Milling & Grain Co. v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- McKenney v. EllsworthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Associated Creditors' Agency v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Levelon Builders, Inc. v. LynnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Felix v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Higgins v. Desert Braemar, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1963