Legal Opinion

In re the Personal Restraint of Dyer

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 7, 2008No. 79872-9PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairhurst, J.

¶1 In 2006, this court directed the Indeterminate Sentence Review Board (ISRB) to redetermine the parolability of Richard J. Dyer after we concluded the ISRB supported its previous decision with speculation and conjecture. We ordered the ISRB to support its decision with objective facts. After the rehearing, the ISRB again determined Dyer was unparolable because he remained an untreated sex offender. We now consider Dyer’s personal restraint petition (PRP) alleging the ISRB again abused its discretion and violated his constitutional rights. We hold the ISRB based its decision upon the…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. California Department of Corrections v. MoralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. City of Spokane v. DouglassWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Matter of Personal Restraint of CashawWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State v. PillatosWashington Supreme Court · 2007

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  2. In Re FlintWashington Supreme Court · 2012
  3. In re the Personal Restraint of FlintWashington Supreme Court · 2012
  4. State v. AmosCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  5. State v. AmosCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API