Legal Opinion
State v. Amos
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided October 21, 2008No. Nos. 36104-3-II; 34375-4-IIPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtQuinn-Brintnall, J.
¶1 In this consolidated personal restraint petition (PRP) and direct appeal, Forrest E. Amos challenges his 120-month exceptional sentence. We affirm the direct appeal and deny Amos’s PRP.
FACTS
¶2 On January 16, 2000, Amos, Matthew Collett, Lane Steele, and Lance Kapsh committed a home invasion robbery of Joe Hull’s home on Urquhart Road in Lewis County, Washington. Following lengthy negotiations that need not be detailed here, Amos pleaded guilty to first degree burglary (count I), first degree robbery (count II), second degree assault (count III), possession of a stolen firearm (count IV),…
2Cases cited64 opinions
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Blackledge v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. BroceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. HughesWashington Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. HughesWashington Supreme Court · 2009
- In re the Personal Restraint of FrancisWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. DelbosqueWashington Supreme Court · 2020
- State v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.