Tahtinen v. MSI Insurance

MSI Insurance Company seeks review of a decision of the court of appeals which held that an insurer is required to stack1 coverage from each policy of uninsured motorist coverage it issues to the same insured even though each of the *160policies contains a reducing clause2 prohibiting stacking of coverage. We hold that the court of appeals correctly determined that the Wisconsin stacking statute is unambiguous. This statute voids reducing clauses which prohibit stacking of multiple policy coverages issued by the same insurer to the same insured. We therefore affirm the decision of the court of…