York Ins. Group of Maine v. Van Hall
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the Court
DANA, Justice.
[¶ 1] Carol Van Hall appeals from a summary judgment entered in the Superior Court (Cumberland County, Brennan, J.) in favor of York Insurance Group of Maine contending that the trial court erred when it determined as a matter of law that she was not entitled to deduct a proportionate share of her attorney fees from the funds due to York pursuant to the subrogation clause of her automobile insurance policy. We agree and vacate the judgment.
[¶2] Following her automobile accident, York paid $5,000 toward Van Hall’s medical expenses pursuant to the medical payment provision of her…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. GelineWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
- Amica Mutual Insurance v. MaloneyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
- Kandlis v. HuotariSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. ClintonOregon Supreme Court · 1974
- Cuthbertson v. Clark Equipment Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- School Union No. 37 v. United National InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010
- U.S. Airways, Inc. v. McCutchenSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Harris v. Harvard Pilgrim Health Care, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
- Lichtenstein v. Consolidated Services Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
- Jipson v. Liberty Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.