Legal Opinion

Grossman v. Public Utilities Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 1966No. 39436PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

This case presents a question of fact. The burden of proof rests upon the complainant. He has failed to produce evidence to establish his claim. The order of the Public Utilities Commission is affirmed.

Order affirmed.

Taft, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill, Herbert, Schneider and Brown, JJ., concur.

2Cited by10 opinions

In re Complaints of Lycourt-Donovan v. Columbia Gas of Ohio, Inc. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2017
Myers v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1992
Luntz Corp. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1997
In re Complaint of OHIOTELNET.COM, INC. v. Windstream Ohio, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2013
Thomas v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.